• Home
  • Blog
  • Publications
    • 2012-2010
    • 2009-2006
    • 2005-2003
  • Projects
  • Courses
  • About
    • Biography
    • Curriculum Vitae (pdf)
    • Bio Sketch (pdf)
    • Working Together
    • Contact
Search

bike friendly

Warning: Next “generation” of bicycle advice forthcoming

11.06.12
0

We have been hearing for the last few years of the bicycle renaissance worldwide. The visibility is undoubtedly helping bicycling. The cries have been upbeat, reassuring, and feel-good: bicycling is good and cities are changing themselves to better accommodate such.

We are starting to better weigh the opportunity costs of different strategies and where there is room for improvement. In a positive step forward, we now have representatives in leading cities questioning some of their initiatives. We are reeling back some of the enthusiasm with a critical eye. This is healthy. Here are some examples:

I offered some thoughts for Boulder, Colorado a few months ago.

We apparently have some hiccups in Copenhagen’s bicycle-sharing system (note: each trip is a whopping $4.50?)

Seattle is apparently getting lots of press for cycling (owing to its Mayor?), but little traction.

 

 

  • facebook Recommend on Facebook
  • linkedin Share on Linkedin
  • twitter Tweet about it
  • rss Subscribe to the comments on this post
  • bookmark Bookmark in Browser
  • email Tell a friend

Be first to comment

Cyclists might not be as cheap as we think

09.28.12
0

Here’s an interesting spin on a different dimension of cyclists (and walkers): the degree to which their per visit expenditures (to supermarkets, bars, restaurants) are more or less than their auto counterparts. My close colleague, Kelly Clifton, recently presented the report to (of course) the Portland bicycling scene.

  • facebook Recommend on Facebook
  • linkedin Share on Linkedin
  • twitter Tweet about it
  • rss Subscribe to the comments on this post
  • bookmark Bookmark in Browser
  • email Tell a friend

Be first to comment

External image of unicyclists

03.27.12
0
I realize that unicyclists are not bicyclists, but it would be interesting to think about the external image of different types of cyclists. In this report, just released:


Shuster, S. (2012). The evolution of humor from male aggression. Psychology Research and Behavior ManagementDOI: 10.2147/PRBM.S29126 


…admiration and concern in women; physical aggression in older boys, which matured into repetitive, aggressively humourous remarks from adult men are the primary thoughts that are expressed about unicyclists.
  • facebook Recommend on Facebook
  • linkedin Share on Linkedin
  • twitter Tweet about it
  • rss Subscribe to the comments on this post
  • bookmark Bookmark in Browser
  • email Tell a friend

Be first to comment

Cycling – transit integration

03.09.12
0
The whole enterprise of integrating cycling with transit is a remarkably understudied issue, lacking a solid knowledge base. Yet, it might have high potential.
Recently published: Krizek, Kevin J. and Eric Stonebraker (2011). Assessing Options to Enhance Cycling-Transit Integration, Transportation Research Record, Journal of the Transportation Research Board. No. 2217: pp. 162–167. DOI: 10.3141.
Abstract: Cycling continues to increase in popularity and garner attention for the ability to achieve environmental, health, and congestion-mitigation benefits for communities. Although the growth in both cycling and transit may be in small part attributed to bicycle and transit integration, the growth is difficult to measure. Which of the variety of available strategies for bicycle and transit integration—such as increased bicycle parking at stops, increased bicycle capacity on transit vehicles, and shared bicycle
infrastructure—is more cost-effective? Which strategies will yield the highest number of cycle transit users? To fill a void in the literature about integrating bicycling and transit, four common bicycle and transit integration strategies were described and assessed. A framework was developed for evaluating strategies, and a preliminary cost-effectiveness assessment was conducted. Cost-effectiveness comprises costs and cyclists’ preferences for each strategy. Preferences were gathered through stated preference surveys from focus groups in five case study communities and calculated according to the analytic hierarchy process, a multicriterion decision-making tool. Transit with a bicycle aboard was most preferred by cyclists, whereas results of the cost-effectiveness measure suggest that enhancing bicycle parking at a transit stop proved most cost-effective when compared with the most common bicycle onboard transit configuration: front-mounted bicycle racks on buses. The limited growth potential for bicycles aboard transit requires consideration of alternatives. The overall importance that cyclists assigned to security suggested considerable room for creative solutions to improve the favorability of the other strategies while addressing some inherent capacity limitations of the most popular strategy: transporting the bicycle with the rider on transit.
  • facebook Recommend on Facebook
  • linkedin Share on Linkedin
  • twitter Tweet about it
  • rss Subscribe to the comments on this post
  • bookmark Bookmark in Browser
  • email Tell a friend

Be first to comment

Naming "bicycling" apartment and condo developments

02.25.12
0
We are now seeing cycling nomenclature weave its way into the actual naming of residential developments:
  • The Peloton in Boulder
  • Opus developers in Minnesota, are planning a new apartment complex named “Velo” , alluding to Minneapolis’ active lifestyle, healthy living, and cycling.
  • facebook Recommend on Facebook
  • linkedin Share on Linkedin
  • twitter Tweet about it
  • rss Subscribe to the comments on this post
  • bookmark Bookmark in Browser
  • email Tell a friend

Be first to comment

Arms race for most bicycle-friendly city; we have more than 10 aspirers

02.17.12
0

As part of the arms race to become the most bicycle friendly city in the US, we are apparently up to at least 10 cities vying for top honors. I am sure there are still a few missing. But, as the article suggests, “this is a great development for the U.S. bike scene. Nothing motivates Americans (and our elected officials) quite like the race to appear in a magazine as the “best” at something. This is true. But, the Big Easy? …really? Wow, congrats on getting to bronze level.

There are at least two rankings in the US, one by the League of American Bicyclists and the other by Bicycling Magazine. Is it possible to be a bit more transparent with the criteria for each? In my limited search, nothing popped out.

  • facebook Recommend on Facebook
  • linkedin Share on Linkedin
  • twitter Tweet about it
  • rss Subscribe to the comments on this post
  • bookmark Bookmark in Browser
  • email Tell a friend

Be first to comment

Blog Topics

accessibility active travel advocacy arms race art behavioral change bicycle transportation bike friendly bike sharing bike type book Boulder brainwashing counting cycling culture cycling environment data distance engineering european cities exposure facilities facility funding healthy communities helmets insights pollution ratings risk factor safe routes to school safety school bus social dimensions speed stature streets surveillance Transportation Research Board travel patterns Uncategorized value of research video walkable youth

Most Popular Posts

  • Advancing “total health:” shining light on somewhat competing issues of physical activity & air pollution exposure
  • Guest post: Kurt Nordback on Bike and Walking Under/over-passes: Separate but Equal
  • Guest post: Adjusting for variation in bike counts (contribution from Krista Nordback)
  • Bicycle helmet and safety research
  • John Pucher on purely academic research vs. politics, implementation and practical approaches to getting things done
  • Cyclists defensive about the pollution they emit

Archives

  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012

Subscribe

(c) 2012 Kevin Krizek